AN UNOFFICIAL HISTORY OF THE KIRKGATE
HAVING THE LAST WORD
Leafing through the programme archive (yes we have all the programmes from 1996 onwards) I found a copy of the “Readers Viewpoints” page of the Times and Star for 23 March 2001, which brought to mind a notorious spat we had with the paper.
Here’s my letter :
“SIR – I am disgusted that your unnamed reviewer sought to use a review of CADS “She Stoops to Conquer” to launch an attack on the Kirkgate Centre.
“It is entirely disingenuous of him to state “I wouldn’t want to knock the Kirkgate Centre, when the headline “Terrific Show- shame about the venue” does precisely that -delivers a gratuitous kick in the teeth to all those unpaid volunteers (including CADS members) who, over the past 10 years have devoted vast amounts of time and effort to creating and maintaining a theatre in Cockermouth – more than a theatre, a multi-purpose venue for cinema, dance, jazz, folk ,cabaret, conferences and exhibitions, parties and beer festivals.
“To describe the Kirkgate as “under-sized” and “makeshift” is insulting and untrue.
“Any such venue is a compromise. The seating at the Sands Centre , for example, is notoriously uncomfortable. Those who use the Kirkgate regularly are well aware of its limitations : in my experience it is no less comfortable than the Theatre Royal or the Carnegie and your reviewer is the first person to complain publicly about inadequate lines of vision.
As for the town deserving a “proper” theatre, it may well be that there is a useful article to be written about why Cockermouth has received only a minute fraction of the taxpayers money lavished on the Carnegie, the woefully under-used Greenhouse, the Maryport Civic Hall and the Blue Box and Theatre by the Lake. I have been told often enough by Allerdale Councillors that the Kirkgate must survive on its own efforts.…..”
Bob Pritchard, Hon Vice-President CADS and Programme Co-ordinator, Kirkgate Centre.
Chris George, then Chairman of CADS and John Barker, Treasurer of Kirkgate Centre Trust both wrote in the same vein. Unfortunately I don’t seem to have the actual review that provoked this outburst. It was actually written by regular reporter Phil Cram and the editor commented that his name was not withheld purposely, but was a production error. The readers’ viewpoints on this occasion were entirely taken up by letters supporting the Kirkgate. Grudges were not held, and Phil Cram himself went on to write many more positive reviews about events at the Centre.
When we see how well-established and well-respected the Kirkgate now is, let’s remember the generations of volunteers and supporters whose dedication and hard work was not always appreciated, yet who still kept the vision alive.
Sadly for local journalism, I think the Kirkgate is now in a far healthier state than the “Times and Star”.
Bob Pritchard
**Editors note: Thanks to the hard work of Bob, and other volunteers and staff, local councils have been much more supportive of our endeavours in recent years, something which we are very grateful for. |